📈 GBPUSD 19th March 2025 Daily Analysis Based on Main Key Levels
- Neom
- Mar 19
- 1 min read
Daily Current Market Price (DCMP): 1.29686
Key Levels:
Resistance (Above DCMP): 1.30403, 1.31788
Support (Below DCMP): 1.29547, 1.28162
📊 Technical Snapshot
Critical Price Zones
Swing High: 1.31788 (Daily/4H Frame)
Swing Low: 1.25502 (Daily/4H Frame)
Fib Retracement: Price consolidating near 50% retracement zone (1.29547–1.30403)
RSI: Neutral on 1H, potential bullish divergence forming
MACD: Bearish crossover confirmed on 4H timeframe

💡 Intraday Trade Opportunities
Intraday Buy Setup 🟢
Entry: 1.29547 📍 (Key Support Level)
Stop Loss: 1.28162 🛑 (Below critical support zone)
Take Profit 1: 1.29686 🎯 (DCMP Retest)
Take Profit 2: 1.30403 🎯 (Immediate Resistance)
Rationale:
Strong confluence at 1.29547 (support + Fib 50%)
Bullish reversal signals emerging on lower timeframes
Intraday Sell Setup 🔴
Entry: 1.30403 📍 (Key Resistance Level)
Stop Loss: 1.31788 🛑 (Above swing high)
Take Profit 1: 1.29686 🎯 (DCMP Retest)
Take Profit 2: 1.30101 🎯 (Swing Low Zone)
Rationale:
Bearish rejection observed at 1.30403–1.31788 supply zone
Declining volume during upward movements indicates weakness
📉 Market Dynamics
Bullish Trigger: Sustained close above 1.30403 could lead to a rally toward 1.31788
Bearish Risk: Breakdown below 1.28162 may accelerate selling to 1.26777
Technical Indicators 🔭
Volume Profile: Thin liquidity near current levels increases volatility risks
Bollinger Bands: Price testing the lower band near 1.29653
ADR (Average Daily Range): 1.2% suggests high intraday momentum
Final Outlook 🎯
GBPUSD remains range-bound between 1.29547–1.30403. Traders should adopt a fade-the-edges strategy:
Buy dips toward 1.29547 with tight risk management
Sell rallies near 1.30403 with trailing stops
🔑 Key Insight: DCMP (1.29686) acts as a psychological pivot – holding above favors bullish bias, while breaking below signals bearish momentum.
📌 Risk Note: Keep an eye on U.S. economic indicators and geopolitical developments for potential market impacts.



Comments